Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: documentation path
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: documentation path
- From: OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:06:07 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:15:16 +0900"<3A642D44.CE6F11B2@example.com>
- Organization: Weatherlight
- References: <3A642D44.CE6F11B2@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <0nSrFD.A._cG.ReEZ6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.2 (Raspberry Beret) WEMI/1.13.7 (Shimada) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i586-kondara-linux)
At Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:15:16 +0900, B0Ti <9915104t@example.com> wrote: > My question is: which one is the standard? I read something about things > like this a long time ago, but don't remember where it was. FHS(File Hierarchy Standard) 2.1 says that architecture independent sharable data should go under /usr/share. So does docs. see: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.1/fhs-4.7.html -- OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro E-Mail: mailto:crouton@example.com Web: http://www.weatherlight.org/~crouton/ PGP: C98F 74E0 AEEB 4578 1DFC F650 3BE0 9627 11FC C9F5 VERBA VOLANT, SCRIPTA MANENT
- References:
- documentation path
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- documentation path
- Prev by Date: Re: Where is SourceForge?
- Next by Date: Re: documentation path
- Prev by thread: documentation path
- Next by thread: Re: documentation path
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |