Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: debian i586?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: debian i586?
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:19:38 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Organization: Kobe University, Japan
- References: <3A2275C7.AA621B83@example.com> <20001127180719.A1469@example.com> <14883.6589.361136.219478@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ygibf.A.GBF.fJzI6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: 9915104t@example.com
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > libc now comes in -586 and -686 optimized versions in woody. But it's not enough for me. XFree, and a few other packages need to be i586. > >> somwere, like khmm.. Mandrake. > Now _there's_ a good reason _not_ to do something. If Mandrake does > it, it's got to be harmful. Do a grep in the archives for "help me", > and see how often the post mentions "Mandrake". :-P Far too often > for my taste, given its low penetration. Actually in the early days, when Mandrake was basically just an i586 port of RedHat linux and not much more, this is what has made it a popular distro IMHO. Now that it has all the shiny point&click config tools no wonder so many newbies started using it. But I'm still using it too, think whatever you want ;-P Anyway, you have the right to hate mandrake and start flaming, but it's not the reason why I pointed out mdk as a i586 distro. > >> I don't feel like recompiling the half distro, somebody must > >> have done this already. > > Why not recompile only your compute-bound apps, and use the time saved > to study up on what optimization is, and what it can and can't do? I thought about it. But if I consider to compile just glibc , XFree, kernel, and a few other packages, that still would keep me and my box busy for a day. And it's just not worth the hassle, for me that is. > Oops, I bet you don't know which of your apps _are_ compute-bound. You may be right, but not quite. Anyway, does it hurt to have the whole distro optimized for the processor i use? > Well, study that first. If I did study that, I still had to recompile stuff after.... > > -- > University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN > Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 > _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ > What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules." > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Next Nomikai (and Bonenkai!): December 15 (Fri) > Next Technical Meeting: January, 2001 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian i586?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- debian i586?
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: debian i586?
- From: "Oliver M . Bolzer" <oliver@example.com>
- Re: debian i586?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: displaying japanese characters
- Next by Date: Re: displaying japanese characters
- Prev by thread: Re: debian i586?
- Next by thread: Re: debian i586?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links