Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Open Source
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Open Source
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:32:24 +0100
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010051027520.1871-100000@example.com>; from sstone@example.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 10:29:52AM -0700
- References: <20001005113252.A2765@example.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10010051027520.1871-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <51m-6.A.vwE.j8L35@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 10:29:52AM -0700, Scott M. Stone wrote: > > Linux - nope, single manager: Linus > > load of crap. What about Alan and ALL the other folks involved? Linus > doesn't have absolute say over many things anymore, IIRC. If he says it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. Why isn't there a kernel debugger? Because Linus doesn't want one. Sure, the other folks have things to do, but he still runs the show. -- Asynchronous inputs are at the root of our race problems. -- D. Winker and F. Prosser
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Source
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: Open Source
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: Open Source
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- Next by Date: Re: Open Source
- Prev by thread: Re: Open Source
- Next by thread: Re: Open Source
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links