Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Open Source
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Open Source
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:38:07 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEOEGACGAA.jshore@example.com>; from jshore@example.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:13:21PM +0900
- References: <20001005103712.A29311@example.com> <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEOEGACGAA.jshore@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <HLBTGC.A.q2D.4zF35@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Jonathan Shore (jshore@example.com) wrote: > * more thorough documentation This seems to imply there's something wrong with that. I'd have to call anything that either causes or forces more thorough documentation to be a GoodThang, since things that don't get documented properly at the time are often in grave danger of not getting documented properly at all. Jonathan
- References:
- Re: Open Source
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- RE: Open Source
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Source
- Next by Date: RE: Open Source
- Prev by thread: RE: Open Source
- Next by thread: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links