Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hardware doctors!
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 17:30:24 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <39C8744F.6C069D4@example.com>; from sajjad@example.com on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 05:24:47PM +0900
- References: <E13be8u-0006Nx-00@example.com> <20000920170024.A12089@example.com> <39C8744F.6C069D4@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <pzXqk.A.P3.GgHy5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 05:24:47PM +0900, Sajjad Zaidi wrote: > They usually develop bad blocks really fast although the SCSIs are not so bad. Aha! With ATA, all bets are off. ATA drives should never be used in applications that require reliability or survivability. Full stop. Don't judge a manufacturer on their ATA quality, as they're all pretty much crap across the board. On a tangent, how many professional sysadmins are actually reading this list? (Apart from me, Ayako, Dmytro, Scott, and Jonathan). I'd be interested to hear hardware horror stories ... -- Chris
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Re: hardware doctors!
- References:
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: shimpei@example.com
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Jonathan Q <j-q@example.com>
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Sajjad Zaidi <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: hardware doctors!
- Prev by Date: Re: hardware doctors!
- Next by Date: Re: hardware doctors!
- Prev by thread: Re: hardware doctors!
- Next by thread: Re: hardware doctors!
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |