Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Network time protocol
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Network time protocol
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:34:07 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <m2u2bbk2gr.fsf@example.com>; from steve@example.com on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 03:21:56PM +0900
- References: <XFMail.20000919140739.s-luppescu@example.com> <m2u2bbk2gr.fsf@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <U0k6I.A.ko.EzFy5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 03:21:56PM +0900, SL Baur wrote: > That's not what I would have guessed. Systems with /dev/random have a > better source of random numbers than a timer and on systems without it > or the equivalent, you're better off not assuming you can get really > random numbers at all. <leading question> Where does the entropy pool for /dev/random come from? </leading question> -- Chris
- References:
- Re: Network time protocol
- From: s-luppescu@example.com
- Re: Network time protocol
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Network time protocol
- Next by Date: Re: hardware doctors!
- Prev by thread: Re: Network time protocol
- Next by thread: debian upgrading problem
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links