Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:40:18 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <m2u2bu84tz.fsf@example.com>; from steve@example.com on Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:48PM +0900
- References: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEAENPCEAA.jshore@example.com> <m2u2bu84tz.fsf@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <h_TSt.A.kGH.frdt5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:30:48PM +0900, SL Baur wrote: > The current Linux C compiler is a Cygnus project. *arrrrrggggghhhhhh* egcs/gcc is _not_ Linux-specific. I do wish that Linux advocates would at least acknowledge that Linux ain't the end-all and be-all of UNIX. gcc predates Linux by quite a piece. Most of the work that goes into gcc is _not_ tied to the OS -- rather, it's improving code generation for a _hardware_ target. -- Chris
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- References:
- RE: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- Next by Date: Re: RedHat 6.1 and Japanese
- Prev by thread: Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- Next by thread: Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links