Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: in subject
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: in subject
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 01:49:26 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <396B3616.E2A36803@example.com>; from Fredric.Fredriksson@example.com on Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 04:58:30PM +0200
- References: <396B3616.E2A36803@example.com>
- Sender: jq@example.com
Fredric Fredricson (Fredric.Fredriksson@example.com) wrote: Fredric> Is there a reason why we can't get "lug:" prepended to the Fredric> subject line any more? Probably not. Well, maybe, if a simple oversight in the rush to get it working counts as a reason :-) Since I haven't dabbled in Smartlist before (will learn real soon, being owner-tlug and all :-) I'm sure we can get that fixed for you. Which do people prefer - prepending the subject with tlug or with TLUG? Jonathan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: in subject
- From: Fredric Fredricson <fredric.fredriksson@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: in subject
- From: Fredric Fredricson <Fredric.Fredriksson@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: hahaha
- Next by Date: sorry about the title (was Re: hahaha)
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: in subject
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: in subject
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links