Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: complex VPN problem (fwd)
- To: "Tokyo Linux Users' Group" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: tlug: complex VPN problem (fwd)
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:45:10 -0800 (PST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Here's a neat one for you - pptp/ppp/linux VPN... Let me know if you have any ideas, this one is a bit of a mystery :) thanks. -------------------------- Scott M. Stone, CCNA <sstone@example.com> UNIX Systems and Network Engineer Taos - The SysAdmin Company ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:05:31 -0800 (PST) From: Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com> To: Taos Network List <network@example.com> Subject: complex VPN problem OK, this is a bit odd.. I have a Linux box with 2 ethernet cards. One card goes directly to my DSL line, with a static IP. the other card goes to an 8-port hub which has two other PCs attached to it. Ok, so the IP masquerading/routing/firewalling/port forwarding seems to work, all the machines can browse, etc, etc. I have ipsec on the router box as well, to connect to my client site for doing email at home through their notes server, that works great as well. HOWEVER, I tried to set up a pptp connection last night to a friend of mine who's using Windows 98. I installed and configured the linux pptpd program, and installed PPP. The pptp connection is established, pppd starts and assigns IP addresses (I assigned my friend's remote machine an IP on my private subnet, 192.168.81.0/24, and I'm using proxyarp with pppd). Now, pppd is working fine, or so I think. From my ROUTER machine (which is 192.168.81.1 (eth1), 63.248.27.129 (eth0), and now 192.168.81.100 (ppp0)), I can see the remote pc (on 192.168.81.101). The remote PC can ping ALL of the interfaces on the router, including 192.168.81.1. HOWEVER, the problem is that the remote PC cannot access 192.168.81.2, which is one of my internal PCs on my 8-port hub. Nor can 192.168.81.2 access the remote PC. However, .2 can access the 'net through that same gateway, and can access the LAN pointed to by ipsec0 without any problems. What am I doing wrong here? Should I be assigning ppp0 the same IP address as eth1 (192.168.81.1?) I also tried assigning a different subnet for the ppp interface and then setting up routing -- same results, no connectivity. Any help is greatly appreciated... thanks. -------------------------- Scott M. Stone, CCNA <sstone@example.com> UNIX Systems and Network Engineer Taos - The SysAdmin Company -------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: March 11 (Sat) 13:00 Temple University Japan * Topic: "What's new in Perl 5.6" Guest speaker: Simon Cozens (TLUG Perl guru) Next Nomikai Meeting: April 20 (Thu) Linux Conference 2000 Spring Ed. -------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Ext3
- Next by Date: tlug: Linux Agents/Robots ??
- Prev by thread: tlug: developerWorks (was Re: Journaling Filesystems)
- Next by thread: tlug: Linux Agents/Robots ??
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links