Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- To: tlug@example.com, chris@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 19:19:19 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Apr 1999 16:14:04 +0900 (JST)"<Pine.LNX.4.10.9904121516300.26945-100000@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9904121516300.26945-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com> wrote, > On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > > > KDE is developed using the Qt libraries, which are not Free, but the > > stuff needed for KDE may be freely distributed, if I understand > > correctly (but isn't open source?). > > Qt is distributed via the Troll Public License, which prohibits the > following: > > * distribution of _any_ patches to Qt, even to fix bugs > * development of non-open source software with Qt (for UNIX platforms, > that is) > > Obviously, this is not free software. > > Troll wised up and fixed their license so that it resembles the BSD > license, but no code has yet been issued under that license -- so their > new license is moot, in my opinion. It is more restrictive than BSD, I think: (1) all modifications must be distributed separate from the original source (eg, as patch files) and (2) you have to grant Troll Tech the right to use your modifications with any other license that they choose (even if you don't make them publicly available). > Is it legal to distribute a GPL'd program that uses Qt? Probably not. > The licenses conflict. Good questions. When Qt would become a standard component of a system, I think, you can use the GPL for Qt-based applications on that system, but as it stands, I think, they conflict. > These are some of the reasons why I use GNOME[1]. Me too :-) All these different licenses only hinder code reuse... BTW, I think, GTK+ is the more interesting toolkit in the long run anyway. With Qt, you are basically restricted to develop in C++ (*yuck*), but for GTK+ there are bindings for many different languages. Manuel ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: TBD Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: June 12 (Sat), 12 :30 place: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: tlug: Meeting data?
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: KDE, GTK...etc. etc
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links