Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: valid mail address
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:22:43
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: <199901250309.MAA02605@example.com>
- References: <Your message of "Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:28:20 JST." <Pine.LNX.4.05.9901251121110.19982-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>From rfc 822: Having had to read this a couple of times, I'd like to propose that RFC writers have to undergo drug tests. :-) > field-name = 1*<any CHAR, excluding CTLs, SPACE, and ":"> >..... > Where permitted (i.e., in words in structured fields) quoted- > strings are treated as a single symbol. That is, a quoted- > string is equivalent to an atom, syntactically. Would something like: darren"@"cook@example.com or darren(@)cook@example.com be allowed, or can the quoted text only contain characters that would be legal? Darren ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: February 13 (Sat), 12:30 place: Temple Univ. ** presentation: XEmacs, by Steven Baur and Martin Buchholz Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Dmytro Kovalev <kovald@example.com>
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: valid mail address
- From: Dmytro Kovalev <kovald@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: valid mail address
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links