Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- To: tlug@example.com, sean@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:35:27 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:03:13 +0900"<369AD791.288748CF@example.com>
- References: <369AD791.288748CF@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Sean Bennett <sean@example.com> wrote, > Thanks for the reply Stephen. > > "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: > > > Sean> I'm looking for a 'make' program for TL3.0 that can take > > Sean> multiple sources files (such as C++, Fortran, and/or Ratfor)... > > > Um, could you be more specific? > > (...details, details... always my undoing...) ah, sorry but actually I can't > be more specific right now :-( > > We have a client currently using SunOS systems, interested in moving to PC's > running TL3.0. As described to me after the fact, besides his hesitation > regarding using gcc, he was looking for something that could handle multiple > source files at the same time with a single 'make' command. > > Forgive my ignorance - I'm not a programer, just getting familiar with the > innards of Linux, and oblivious to the workings of SunOS; from my understand > though it appears he's looking for something to match a functionality he > currently enjoys under SunOS... How is the client solving the problem in SunOS? The chances that the same solution would work under Linux are high. Sun's compiler are quite nice, but gcc is also a very high quality compiler. As long as the client does not depend on some special features of the Sun compiler (maybe in conjunction with the OS), such as, SunOS kernel threads; a migration to gcc shouldn't be difficult. Furthermore, as gcc is available on a very wide range of platforms, this move will make your clients software in general more portable (ie, it may be worthwhile even if some work is involved). The question about the single `make' command puzzles me as it does Steve. Given you have the appropriate makefile (and you need this on SunOS as you need it on Linux - and you can actually use the same file), make can translates for you with a single invocation hundreds of files in as many languages as you have compilers. So, if your client is looking for a `make' program (and I mean the name `make' literally here) with similar functionality as the `make' of SunOS, he will get it on Linux (and any other Un*x for that matter). There might be one problem though, what kind of Fortran does you client need (F77, F90)? `g77' is GNU's F77 compiler, but I don't know how good it is compared to commercial compilers. I am not sure whether there is a F90 on Linux. Furthermore, Fortran people often depend on some of the many libraries that are available for Fortran. You should check out if your client needs any, and if so, if they are available on Linux. This is much more the direction where I see problems... Manuel ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 14 January 1999, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 *** it will will be Jan 14 (Thu), as Jan 15 (Fri) is a natl holiday Next Technical Meeting: Feb 13 (Sat), 12:30 ace: Temple Univ. ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- References:
- Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- From: Sean Bennett <sean@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: 1run C++,Fortran,Ratfor makes
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links