Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- To: Tokyo Linux Users Group <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 21:41:00 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981120190052.7498G-100000@example.com>; from Michael Casinghino on Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 07:05:47PM +0900
- Mail-Followup-To: Tokyo Linux Users Group <tlug@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981120190052.7498G-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> Michael Casinghino writes: (on 20 Nov 98) > I have moral objections to making distinctions between /usr/local/ and > /usr/. I mean isn't _everything_ local? Really? Is there a reason I > shouldn't do this? The intent behind local originally was for "local" additions not part of the O.S. from the systems vendor. That is, /usr/local should be empty (except for possibly a directory hierarchy, {bin,etc,man,...}) immediately after installing an O.S. from the vendor's source media. Any locally compiled software would then go into /usr/local so that it wouldn't be overwritten by vendor patches and O.S. revs. If it was a separate filesystem, you could even leave it unmounted during a patch installation or OS upgrade and be *sure* you're local stuff would remain untouched. If you're religious about only using a decent package manager and well designed packages, then /usr/local should be completely unnecessary. The package manager keeps a database of what is installed where and prevents conflicts for you. Before RPM and Debian (and before Sun's pkgadd) the admin had to keep track of local customizations manually, and /usr/local made sense. Somewhat of an aside, but one of the things that really irritated me about Sun was all the cruft they kept putting in /etc/rc.local release after release. According to the original intent, this file should have always been empty after a system install, but Sun made it a critical file in the boot process that did all sorts of things, then told admins to modify the heck out of it whenever they wanted to add or change something! Grrr. Auspex added a file /etc/rc.local.`hostname` that was for truly local additions explicitly to prevent problems after an OS upgrade (we wouldn't touch it, just source it a the end of rc.local). Regards, -- Rex ---------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 HSBC Securities Office ---------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsors: PHT, HSBC Securities
- References:
- tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- From: Michael Casinghino <michael@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: make /usr/local/ a link to /usr/ ?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links