Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Jim Schweizer <schweiz@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 17:01:58 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <19981007153538.B12097@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Hi all, On 07-Oct-98 Rex Walters wrote: > P.S. The list is reasonably fast (or at least not outrageously slow) > again. Hooray! Who fixed what (and thanks!)? Jim T. installed bind 4.9.7 as a caching name server yesterday. This is probably why things have sped up a bit. Regards, Jim S. --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Mailing List Response Time
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- Next by Date: tlug: Re: Code Crusader
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Mailing List Response Time
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links