Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- From: Howard Abbey <habbey@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 16:49:51 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Organization: N.E.C.
- References: <36131BB0216.5FD1WASHI@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Well, Stephen J. Turnbull's mail just arrived, so just consider this an echo of his mail, with more details of the Hit-o-meter's operation and clientele. John De Hoog wrote: > "We [=Web Site Journal] took more than 2,000,000 Web pageviews > >from approximately 5,000 Web sites using Web Site Garage's > Hitometer and found the following statistics: > > Windows 95 63.2% > Windows 98 16.3% >... > Linux 0.6% > > [end quote] > (Assuming the results are meaningful, There's a few things that make this data nearly-worthless for estimating 'total web presence.' 5,000 web sites of how many on the web? Perhaps enough to be statistically relevant, but I doubt it. This 'hitometer' would only be used on sites without access to the web server logs. This rules out large companies, and many small companies as well. It would be also used only by web page makers willing to pay to see who is visiting their site. I doubt (m)any individuals would pay for this, when similar free counters are available for an less detailed info fix. My suspicion is that it's only people selling something, or people in a rush to get on the on-line bandwagon. So this 'survey' self-selects the type of web-pages, and therefore the type of people looking. This is my biggest guess as to the outcome of the results. The 'hitometer' uses a loadable graphic to record visits. So, it ignores: text-only browsers browsers with graphics turned off people who filter out web advertisements and counter.cgi people too impatient for the extra slow graphic to load It gets confused by: people behind proxies / firewalls / caching sites None of these are restricted to Linux users. (I know all are available to at least Windows users.) However, it may be true that Linux users fall into the above categories more often. My guess is that the results are a mix of the second thing you suggested, 'hiding their (Linux) identities', and mostly the third, but instead of 'don't Web browse very much', don't browse sites collecting information amateurishly very much. -- Howard --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- From: Howard Abbey <habbey@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Interesting statistic
- From: John De Hoog <washi@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Nikkei Shimbun
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Interesting statistic
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links