Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Re: Transitioning to Linux/Linux in an MS World.
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Re: Transitioning to Linux/Linux in an MS World.
- From: tjhaslam <tjhaslam@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 17:06:46 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: <13835.14359.227552.980850@example.com>
- References: <360B31FD104.624BWASHI@example.com><19980925130707D.andy@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980925133911.14608F-100000@example.com><360B31FD104.624BWASHI@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
At 15:31 98/09/25 +0900, John De Hoog writes: > > provided as Word 97 files in order for me to get paid. Most documents > > also contain a large number of technical drawings, which I have been > > doing using Smartdraw, a Windows program. When I don't have time to do > > them myself, I farm them out to an Australian firm. That company can > > work in Windows or on a Mac, but does not do Linux (yet). Does Linux > > have a comparable program for doing technical drawings easily? > > > > These are a few of the realities I'm faced with in making any transition > > to Linux. I'll wager there's no easy solution at this point in time. Am > > I right? Marcus Metlzer writes: >Seems like the problem is with the customers who want Word files. If >they would shift to Linux ... >Well, that want happen any time soon I guess. But I think TeX or LaTeX >is much better than Word especially for scientific and technical text. I hate to disagree with people who are much smarter than I am. And Marcus Metzler easily qualifies for that. But I have to believe that the problem is distinctly NOT with the customers who want Word files. In terms of endusers, the vast majority of the corporate world is an MS OS/MS Office World. Not to mention that most OEM argeements bundle not only MS OS but also, at the miminal, MS Word and Excel. But not only is MS OS 90% of the installed base on PC`s, but even on MAC OS`s MS Office--and MS Word--reigns supreme. Suggest you check the figures for what are the most widely installed, most used, and best selling PC apps. This is not--I repeat NOT--a technical debate about what is superior. Hoog`s query is about realistically using Linux, as a SOHO professional or other, in an MS World. **Compatibily with MS is a necessity rather than an option**. At least not an option for anyone wants to function, get paid, and keep on working. Maybe in the Tech, Sci, and certain other groves of academia, the Linux Professors get to call the shots. Nowhere else; and no time soon. And as Marcus Metzler rightfully observes, don`t hold your breath waiting for a mass corporate migration to Linux. (Or query some of your fellow Tluggers as to why such a migration might be undesirable. Besides not very likely.) Enough ranting out of frustration and back to the issue at hand. Simple answer to De Hoog: Don`t transition to Linux . . . yet. The applications are just aren`t there. At least don`t transition a number of standard--dare I say basic--enduser tasks. Right now, the knock-down superiority of Linux is as a server/sys adm machine. If you have your own lan/intranet, server, et cetera, there you can make some effective and cost-saving moves. But as for what`ve you described: forget it--for now. As for concerns with filters/conversions/compability, Brother: welcome to the club. Not to enlist him on my side or indict him in my raving, but JB not that long ago queried Filtrix about doing a port to Linux. A Linux version would indeed help greatly--but no time soon. Applix does have MS Word import and export filters, but these can be shaky and seem also to lag one version behind whatever the current versions of Office is. Furthermore, if your documents have serious formatting--graphics, charts, and what not, I suggest you simply don`t risk it. You`re getting paid to do a job: client wants it in Word, client goddamn gets it in Word. Right now, for people like yourself, Linux should be about increasing your computing effectiveness, expanding your options. Don`t apologize for being a Multi-OS user. When your MS set-up gets the job done quicker and better, use it. F--- the people who don`t understand that. Good news, sort of. Having used a lot of Wordperfect in the past, which is now available for Linux, I`ve found their filters--import and export--to be generally excellent and up to date. Also, but not necessarily, Corel is probably testing the waters. If enough versions of Linux WP sell, Corel Office won`t be far behind. That will handle almost anything MS can dish out--and send it back as well. I like Applix. One or two more versions/refinements and hey--maybe it`s right there. But I would wait, if I were you. Other good news, I think. On a related topic, Scott Stone said some time earlier (for the record, I have no professional association with PHT and poor Scott does not share in or even condone my madness) that commerical development for Linux has been increasing at an amazing pace and hence in a year or two, all these issues will hopefully be non-issues. Let me tell you this: if Linux/Applix--MS Office comapabilty were considerably more seamless and painless than it is now, you would have shot at living in the sort of world that Marcus Metlzer talks about: one where your clients might damn well be switching to Linux, or even just more than happy to have the material in a Linux native format. As well, a considerable number of machines where I work would be booting out Bill and booting up with the Penguin. Want Linux to really compete with MS? Then our smart boys have to realize that Linux apps must be able to co-exist and be compatible with MS. At least for any future that I can see. According to some estimates, M$ now is point 5--that`s dot 5--% of the US GDP. Fellow Tluggers, take the concerns of people like myself--and I will include De Hoog, for now, in this heretical group--just a little more seriously, and you`ll have our undying respect, appreciation, et cetera, as well as a helluva of lot more cash flowing in and more people getting to love the joy of the--at least occasional--line command. Difficult and even scary as it will be, Linux has a helluva a better future, finally, as an alternative/option to MS than as the poor man`s Unix. Enough. I`ll be quiet, and good, and do my best not to post to the list on this topic anymore. Regardless, best to all with all, TJH --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- tlug: Re: Transitioning to Linux/Linux in an MS World.
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Transitioning to Linux (was: Many Faces on Linux)
- From: John De Hoog <washi@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: Many Faces on Linux
- From: "Andrew S. Howell" <andy@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: Many Faces on Linux
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- tlug: Transitioning to Linux (was: Many Faces on Linux)
- From: Marcus Metzler <mocm@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Transitioning to Linux (was: Many Faces on Linux)
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Game CD copyright question
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Transitioning to Linux (was: Many Faces on Linux)
- Next by thread: tlug: Re: Transitioning to Linux/Linux in an MS World.
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links