Re: tlug: e-Mailers [was:Mew on (X)Emacs the way to go?

[Rex Walters <rex@example.com>]

On Thu, Sep 24, 1998 at 10:13:52AM +0900, Chris Sekiya wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Rex Walters wrote:
> 
> > I seem to remember a blurb in freshmeat or somewhere saying that balsa
> > was using (or will use) mutt as a back end, but the last time I looked
> > that wasn't the case.  Anyone know more? 
> 
> It does.  I've been hacking on the IMAP support over the last couple of
> days.  Balsa is pretty broken, but has potential.

Interesting.

The mutt folks used to be pretty adamant about not including IMAP support.
It's a wonder there is even any POP support.  The prevailing opinion
seemed to be "POP/IMAP/Whatever can be handled via an external program
(notably fetchmail)".

How is balsa handling IMAP?

Regards,
-- 
Rex
---------------------------------------------------------------
Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate
Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30  Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp