Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: To Applix E/J from MS Office
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: To Applix E/J from MS Office
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:05:23 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <13816.32465.369965.712743@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >>>>> "jb" == Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com> writes: > > jb> Doesn't replace Outlook. Applix Mail is so bad they should > jb> have just left it out of the package :-( > > Hmm, my opinion exactly---of Outhouse. But then, I only get to > receive Outhouse's product, I might feel differently if I could impose > it on others :-) But who needs it? I can screw up MIME headers and > mailbomb my colleagues with easily available free software! > > jb> Neither Applix nor WordPerfect currently has filters for > jb> anything newer than Office 6.0 (pre-Windows 95 stuff). The > jb> conversion wouldn't be at all seamless. I'm not dissing > jb> Applix, it's a decent product, but it's weak points are its > jb> abominable mail client and poor ability to import files. > > Yeah, well, you should try importing a trivial Word document into an > older version of Word. But I guess if you're corporate you can just > offload the costs of upgrading every time MS releases on the customer. > > Not. > > The conversion might not be seamless, but at least you'd be rid of the > damn ring in your nose. > > jb> I'd love to say ATOK come out with a Linux version, though. > jb> Wnn6 would have to either adapt or die in very short > jb> order. Canna might hang around because it's free. > > Um, what's so great about ATOK or Kotoeri? I don't notice Canna > anymore (except for the decision to put the kigou list on <INSERT>, > which is 5mm too close to <Backspace> on JIS keyboards). > > OTOH, I found SKK only very mildly annoying. :-) I think that all of these issues will be moot within 2 or 3 years. Commercial application support for Linux is increasing geometrically, and I think that the commercial vendors will solve these problems within that time frame. Just a guess, though. I may be quoted on this list in 2001 and have people make fun of me, then, but it seems reasonable now :) -------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com, sstone@example.com> <sstone@example.com> Head of TurboLinux Development/Systems Administrator Pacific HiTech, Inc (USA) / Pacific HiTech, KK (Japan) http://www.pht.com http://armadillo.pht.co.jp http://www.pht.co.jp http://www.turbolinux.com -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- Re: tlug: To Applix E/J from MS Office
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: AW: tlug: Japanese filenames (was: EUC & SJIS)
- Next by Date: Re: AW: tlug: Japanese filenames (was: EUC & SJIS)
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: To Applix E/J from MS Office
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: To Applix E/J from MS Office
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links