Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 13:14:02 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980615182543.asbel@example.com>
- References: <13700.44264.465394.632159@example.com><XFMail.980615182543.asbel@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Matt" == Matthew J Francis <asbel@example.com> writes: On 15-Jun-98 Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >> This is getting on towards supporting locales, don't you think? Matt> Yes, in the widgets. That's tangential, however, to my Matt> original assertion that a general input protocol/server can Matt> be designed without any particular knowledge of the locale Matt> of the conversions it serves; it need not know of locale, Matt> only of conversion. Alright, admittedly the line is a fine Matt> one. It needs to be sufficiently general, it need to know what the union of features of locales current and yet to be defined are. This is not a program, nor a systems product, nor yet a programming system. It is (one component of) a programming systems product. Cf. Brooks, _The Mythical Man-Month_, Ch. 1: The Tar Pit. Matt> One very real problem, however, could be the combination of Matt> programs that have been designed with horizontal Entry Matt> widgets with languages that are only written vertically. Good point. Let's remember this one. Matt> Implementing that, then, would likely require the close Matt> attention of native writers of the relevant Matt> languages. Leaving sufficient flexibility to allow their Matt> implementation, though, should be achievable without. [...] Matt> These points are good - but we are skipping, I think, a Matt> little too far ahead of implementation. Once there is code, Matt> it will stand criticism of its generality and Matt> future-proofness. Then you and I disagree about the state of the art and the size of the problem. You're much more optimistic than I am. Matt> Are there good Free fonts for Arabic and Devanagari? Free fonts exist in the Mule distribution; good redistributable ones, maybe, in the redistributable Unicode fonts. (Bitstream has contributed one maybe?) >> It's an awfully heavy-weight way to enter name and address in a >> web browser HTML order form, wouldn't you say? Matt> Yes, I would so say. Something a little lighter-weight is Matt> needed... Bzzt. Not if XEmacs is already the center of your work environment. Then its additional weight, if used as a widget for other apps, is about that of a neutrino. And the ease of use is nearly infinite. Such environments are rare, though. OK, you're ready to start coding, and I'm ready to start criticizing. Let's go! 行こうぞ! -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 8 August, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 *** 20 June: TLUG will be at the Tokyo Linux Fair http://tlug.linux.or.jp/projects/linux-fair/fair.html -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: "Matthew J. Francis" <asbel@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: "Matthew J. Francis" <asbel@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: RH 5.1 and CDE 1.2
- Next by Date: tlug: MI/X PC X server
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links