Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: diald (was: mouse fixed; now what about email)
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: RE: tlug: diald (was: mouse fixed; now what about email)
- From: "Jonathan Byrne - 3Web" <jq@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 13:42:43 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-2022-jp"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
-----Original Message----- 差出人 : Manuel Chakravarty <chak@example.com> >Windoze may be plug-and-play for your kids at home with one >PPP dialup connection and your private printer, but for >anything more than a toy network it seems to be a joke... >and for anything more than a toy network you'll anyway need >an expert at least for setting up and maintaining the >network infrastructure -- that is were I agree with >Karl-Max. Like you don't need at least as much of an expert to do the same thing under Linux or any other Unix? You know perfectly well that you do, so that argument is a complete non-starter. My original argument was that using Windows 95 or a Mac, a beginner with not much knowledge, but some instructions from their ISP, can usually get online quickly and easily for a basic dial-up connection. Can they do this on a Linux machine? The general answer is "no" (this looks like it's a lot easier on TurboLinux, but I haven't actually tried it, so I can't comment). In many cases, they are going to need to know modem init strings, know something about authentication, at least be able to read a Unix shell script and find the right places to type things in, even if they won't have to write a script themselves. My point was/is that you shouldn't have to know that stuff just to dial an ISP in a basic situation. If your system requires that you do, that's a sign of an antiquated, neanderthal software design. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs got rich by understanding this and making computers that were easy for people who weren't computer professionals to use. I think PHT is going to make a lot of money in the Linux market that way, too. I'm sure they're doing well even now, and Red Hat is also doing quite well. Guess who isn't doing as well? Slackware, the distribution that was once king. Slackware is currently on a road straight to insignificance as a Linux distribution, and will soon arrive there if they don't adapt to changing times. Look around Akihabara and try to find a Slackware CD; six months ago, they were all over the place. If a store sold Linux, it sold Slackware. Now a lot of places don't carry it. What do they have? TurboLinux. MediaLab II. PHT's FreeBSD-J. The writing is on the wall. Linux isn't just a hacker's OS anymore. Those days are over. Karl-Max is a real expert on Linux and can configure everything manually, and that's fine. One of the great attractions of Linux for many people is they can do it anyway they want to do it. And people who don't want to spend all of their time learning the innards of their computer but just want to use it should have the freedom to do so. They should have the software tools that allow them to do so. And people who can provide those tools are going to make a ton of money doing it. We don't tell them they should be able to repair the hardware on their computer if something breaks. They call a professional tech, and that's fine. We don't say people should be able to do heavy engine work or suspension system repairs on their car as a condition of being allowed to have a drivers license (I can, and I used to really enjoy that stuff, but I would never make that a condition for anyone to drive). Likewise, we shouldn't be telling people they need expert/professional knowledge or they just shouldn't have a computer. If a computer requires that level of knowledge just for day to day tasks like connecting to an ISP, the way the computer works needs to be re-thought and improved. Apple is right: think different. I'm not a fan of the Mac as such, because I don't much care for MacOS compared to others, but Apple did a lot of great things. They made it easy for a person to add components to their computer, because you usually have to do almost nothing other than just plugging it in. Even for SCSI. They made it so that with a little basic training, you do a lot of things because all programs used a common look and feel. The learning curve shrunk by orders of magnitude. This inspired Microsoft to get on the stick and come up with a PnP system and a GUI, too. Finally, even the Unix camp started moving in that direction, although there is still a great deal of catching up to be done. But making computers easy to use is just The Right Thing. Not just for home users/SOHO users, but for big businesses who need productivity. When an employee (or IS staff member called in to help) is spending her time doing stuff to her computer to make it work right, she isn't doing her regular work, and the computer isn't performing it's function as a tool for that work. Flogging the system just to make it work is not the goal (unless you're a computer hobbyist who does it for fun, which is one reason why we're running Linux), nor is becoming a computer expert whether you want to or not. The goal is getting your work done using your tool, the computer, and it's word processing, spreadsheet, and database access software. That other stuff is just a series of obstacles that get in the way of your doing your work. Those obstacles should be minimized. That's what me and a lot of other people working in the computer field try to do for our customers, and our customers appreciate it. It's what they want. I also deplore the astonishingly low level of knowledge of some of the people I get support calls from, and am amazed that they have never done *anything* to educate themselves about their computer at all. They should at least do something. But Karl-Max sets the bar of what people should know far too high; not everyone is, wants to be, or should be, a hacker. And if our computer system requires you to have that much knowledge just to do basic operations, the problem isn't you. It's the system. An ideal system is one that let's you hack it as much as you want if you care to, but also doesn't require you to hack it if you don't want to, at least for the basic functions that you would need a computer to do every day. Linux will, IMO,come to fulfill that dual ideal better than anything else currently available. Right now, you can hack it all you want. Not having to if you don't want to is being worked on and is making great progress :-) Jonathan Byrne <E-mail:jq@example.com> Media and Content Section 3Web - Your Internet Solution! <URL:http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/index.en.html> -------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 After June 13, the next meeting is 8 August at Tokyo Station -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: diald (was: mouse fixed; now what about email)
- From: Manuel Chakravarty <chak@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Newcomer...
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: Cobalt Qube
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: diald (was: mouse fixed; now what about email)
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: diald (was: mouse fixed; now what about email)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links