Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- From: David J Iannucci <dji@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 01:04:53 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- References: <199803180035.TAA23018@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>> when I do that, the only one that "looks right" (i.e. fills up the >> screen and isn't warped) is the 1280x1024 at (I think) 8bpp that >> is my usual default. > > Hmm, it isn't supposed to look warped at any resolution. That's something > that even Jonathan the Problem Magnet hasn't attracted yet :-) Are you sure > you have the right video driver selected and your monitor isn't sick? Jonathan, Thanks for the reply. Yes, I'm using the right X server (Mach64), and when I said warped, what I meant was that the desktop image only takes up about 2/3 of the screen area, the edges are strangely curved rather than straight and square, and (most disturbingly) the edges of the desktop image are cut off (e.g. if I have a clock in the corner, half or so of the clock is just chopped off, like a cropped photo). I'm beginning to think this is a monitor clocks problem, but I sure don't have the experience to start messing with these values by hand... > If you run xf86config and set it to 1280 x 1024, what is the highest > color depth it will let you choose? I confess to not knowing how much > video memory you need to go 24 bpp at the resolution, I only need 16bpp, and I've got 2MB, so I can go up to 1152x8??, but don't make it to 1280x1024. I haven't played with it yet, but I've been using XF86Setup for configuring, and I don't think this lets you choose run-time bpp or resolution (this info isn't specified in the config file, in any case). > The command line switch when you start X and want to set your color > depth is: startx -bpp nn Thanks, and thanks to Scott for the correction :^) Philosophical question, for anyone: why is this hardware-level video configuration crap not necessary for Mac and Windows, and isn't there _some_ way they can make it unnecessary for X?! This is arguably the most serious obstacle, I think, to the popularization of Linux. What a pain in the neck! We're supposed to have gotten beyond this stage of things by now, aren't we? Oh geez, here I go, getting started again... :^) Dave --------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 11 April Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Tague Griffith of Netscape i18n talking on source code --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: tlug: Intel Pentium-II
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Libretto
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: X resolution / color depth
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links