Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 19:08:30 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <199802030814.RAA04310@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980203082950.24460A-100000@example.com><199802030814.RAA04310@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Alberto" == A Tomita,Jr <Alberto@example.com> writes: Alberto> I have a problem here: after having the unfortunate idea of Alberto> upgrading to RedHat 5.0, my PPP setup stopped working. Sigh. Alberto> I have a few machines networked using the private IP address Alberto> space 192.168.1.0. RH Linux 5.0 (with kernel upgraded to Alberto> 2.0.33) is running at 192.168.1.1. The modem is connected to Alberto> this machine, that is also my DNS and NIS servers. Its routing Alberto> table (netstat -r) shows: This is not as interesting as `route -n'. (If the DNS is likely to get screwy, you need that `-n'.) In particular, I'd like to know what the `metric' column says. You might be able to create dummy routes with huge metrics through your ethernet card, ie, `route add default metric 10000 eth0'. This shouldn't hinder your ability to squirt packets to 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 addresses. Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo After starting PPP, it becomes: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 165.76.88.25 * 255.255.255.255 UH 1524 0 0 ppp0 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo default 165.76.88.25 0.0.0.0 UG 1524 0 0 ppp0 Try `route del default' and see if you can ping that gateway machine. Next `route del 192.168.1.0'. Alberto> Apparently the PPP link went up successfully, but... a Alberto> traceroute to 152.2.254.81 gives: traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 192.168.100.1 @ eth0 traceroute to 152.2.254.81 (152.2.254.81), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 * * WTF is that 192.168.****100****.1?!!? I hope it's a typo. What does your ifconfig say about your interfaces? Do you have ip forwarding, firewalling, and/or bridging enabled? See what `ipfwadm -{F,I,O} -l' has to say. --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Saturday Meeting: 14 February 1998 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu Chuo ticket gate. --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- From: "A.Tomita,Jr." <alberto@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: joem <joem@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- From: "A.Tomita,Jr." <Alberto@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Hello...
- Next by Date: tlug: Re: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Infoworld Review
- Next by thread: tlug: PPP&RH5.0 (was: Infoworld Review)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links