Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 96 17:05 JST
- In-Reply-To: <199606030452.NAA04491@example.com> (anishi@example.com)
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew N Nishigaya <anishi@example.com> writes: Andrew> At 01:19 PM 6/3/96 JST, you wrote: >> Well, yes, but can I get it to pipe me the original so I can >> use supercite? And can I easily use multiple buffers so I can >> collect quotes from several source messages? Andrew> Pine saves the original in a temp file and invokes your Andrew> editor using that file. I am not sure if that will do Andrew> what you need or not... What is supercite? Well, I may be able to set that up so that supercite would work. Supercite is a fancy Emacs-LISP-based yank-and-quote package. It is quite smart about parsing headers to determine the user's name for attributed quotations and the reference headline. It also is pretty smart about multiple levels of quotation. The only thing it does poorly (and I don't know of a quotation engine that does this well) is that it does not recognize preformatted text, like program fragments, and it auto-fills them. When properly set up (I haven't fixed my current Mule since the big crash in March) it will allow you to yank from several Emacs buffers in succession, thus quoting and attributing several authors correctly in the same message. Supercite expects to be fed the original message in one buffer, and to be given another buffer in which the message is to be composed. Supercite does not mess with the headers or any other contents of the reply buffer; it only yanks, formats, and attributes the quoted message. But Pine still flunks on the quote-multiple-messages criterion, and on the file-per-message criterion. The point of the file-per-message criterion is that I'd like to be able to do things like for m in `grep -il '^From: turnbull'`; do head $m; rm -i $m; done which are kinda hard to do with most MUAs. I could program it in Emacs-LISP and continue to use RMail for personal purposes, but I archive a couple of mailing lists and the file-per-message format is nice for getting only the "hits." >> And editors? I've only used Eudora a tiny bit on the Mac. >> It's like not available for Linux anyway, right? Andrew> Nope, sorry. Only for Mac and Windows... the Eudora part Andrew> was actually a joke :) I sorta thought so.... -- Stephen John Turnbull University of Tsukuba Yaseppochi-Gumi Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, 305 JAPAN turnbull@example.com
- References:
- Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- From: "Andrew N. Nishigaya" <anishi@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- Next by Date: Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- Prev by thread: Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- Next by thread: Re: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links