Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Linux on Laptop
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Linux on Laptop
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- Date: Wed, 22 May 96 18:38 JST
- In-Reply-To: <0095000004668271000002*@example.com> (LNJPTYO1.MDARCY01@example.com)
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Mark" == LNJPTYO1 MDARCY01 <LNJPTYO1.MDARCY01@example.com> writes: Mark> Having problems getting Linux installed and working on a Mark> Compaq LTE 5100. Compaqs have problems, somebody sent me a BIOS munging program that helps he said. Will send it to you under separate cover later. Mark> I am using a PCMCIA card for an ethernet connection, but the Mark> cardmgr for the pcmcia cards will not load properly due to Mark> an error incurred when loading the pcmcia module on Mark> start-up. insmod reports an error "kernel_version needed, Mark> but can't be found". I have tried to load other modules with Mark> the insmod -f command but I get the same message. Is there Mark> some place that insmod looks for the kernel version? Yes, on the kernel and the module itself. (The /usr/lib/modules/x.y.z dodge is a convenience for people, the kernel still checks the module itself.) insmod -f is not reliable, sometimes it works, sometimes it fails utterly, sometimes it leaves with an unstable system. I would avoid it if I were you. Even for "installation only"---I always forget to fix the "just to get it running" kludges once it is running. Mark> To add to the problem, the modules are probably compiled for Mark> a 1.2.13 kernel, and I am having to use a 1.3.59 kernel Forget it, no way, give up now. Modules use all kinds of internal kernel functions. I had lots of problems with the 1.3.59 kernel, too. The 1.3.7x kernels were better, the pre2 kernel is working well for me. Mark> because the other will not recognize the PCI bus. Thus I Mark> thought the insmod -f would avoid the version control issue, Mark> but maybe not. Mark> I have a bare bones RedHat 3.0.3 installed, i.e. base and Mark> network software only, no compilers or development. Reason Mark> being I am having to install from floppies. I understand and sympathize, but I think your best bet is to get a development system installed. Can you kermit it across (eg under MSDOS) or something like that? -- Stephen John Turnbull University of Tsukuba Yaseppochi-Gumi Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, 305 JAPAN turnbull@example.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux on Laptop (addendum to module versions)
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- References:
- Linux on Laptop
- From: LNJPTYO1.MDARCY01@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: X Background Diversions?
- Next by Date: Re: Linux on Laptop (addendum to module versions)
- Prev by thread: Linux on Laptop
- Next by thread: Re: Linux on Laptop (addendum to module versions)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links