Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:14:41 +0200
- From: Christian Horn <chorn@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- References: <CAAhy3dsGd-05-PZsO1_rOzLmmkFJJwwnKZt5Bc96+kNrG4hhxA@mail.gmail.com> <YUbpc+W897zMrOgz@fluxcoil.net> <611fd353-cde3-0ae7-0dbf-e1b54dc60174@gmail.com> <YUe1xe9qiMe7ZJSb@fluxcoil.net> <CAAhy3dv55SE0b+0YR35Qpzbgu4OW7VgBNoxb24aEzHg9McM+bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hoi, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:06:24AM +0800, Raymond Wan wrote: > On 20/9/2021 6:12 am, Christian Horn wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:21:17AM +0800, Raymond Wan wrote: > [..] > So, would this work, then? What if I picked a server on my cluster of > 5 servers. Let's say node1. I format the SAN as an ext4 and the > node1 mounts this SAN. But then, it exports it to the other servers > in its /etc/exports file. And the other nodes mounts it as if it > belonged to node1 using NFS. Does this effectively mean that node1 > becomes this SAN's "manager"? Sounds good. If that first node has an issue like broken hard- ware which can not be fixed quickly, you could make one of the other nodes the nfs server. > I think I would like to avoid either OCFS2 or GFS2, if I can. I'm > sure it would be the best solution (somehow...). Perhaps it would > distribute the workload of locking equally across all servers instead > of giving the burden all to node1. But it seems difficult [to me] and > more trouble than it's worth [so far]. NFS without an HA-cluster here would require you to manually make a different node the NFS-server. With OCFS2/GFS2, ideally the client would not notice if one of the servers goes down. > Thank you for this list! I really appreciate how you laid it out for > me in such a clear way. I actually saw both e-mails before I started > writing my reply. Guess I wanted to make sure I understood what was > being said. > In essence, what I said at the beginning of this e-mail is option (a) > exactly, right? Perhaps I should try that. Yes, it's a). > Thank you for all your help! Really lost here...would have liked to > be looking after this SAN with a team so that we can discuss options, > but it's just me. NP. I'ts a niche topic, I just happen to know something about that as we offer GFS2 support and work on the code. > http://www.linux-kongress.org/2010/slides/gfs2ocfs2-seidel.pdf That's a nice piece (full disclosure: I know Udo, the author) Chris
- References:
- [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- From: Raymond Wan
- Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- From: Raymond Wan
- Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- From: Christian Horn
- Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- From: Raymond Wan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Help with fsck and ocfs2 (or even ext4?)...
- Index(es):