TLUG Mailing List

http://blog.zorinaq.com/my-experience-with-the-great-firewall-of-china/

There was mention of SoftEther using SSTP over :443, which may be better as HTTPS is not blocked, however my Apache web server is already lord of :443.

Would it be possible to set up a Vhost on a subdomain (like softether.mydomain.com) that could intercept the :443 ?

——————

I like the idea of setting up a google cloud server in the "always free” tier running only the softether on a RH micro machine. Though the data to china is priced higher, it could, for my limited use, be a good way to go. Though I have no experience whatsoever using such virtual machines…

For the moment, OpenVPN is working which was the original goal. The real goal is getting access to google / FB, Twitter, etc. when in China.

Regards,

Kevin Sullivan

kts@example.com

JP M: +81456702373
USA M: +17853184287
Estonia M: +37254728541

On Oct 22, 2017, at 11:12, Georgi Georgiev <chutz@example.com> wrote:

That's pretty much what I did (in addition to having an instance at home).

OpenVPN on the smallest possible GCP instance, which fits in the "Always Free" tier. It's there when I need it, and you only "pay as you go" for the bandwidth at 23 US cents per GB. Which makes it perfect for the occasional trip to China.

The only trick is that on Android, the "official" OpenVPN client (the top search result "OpenVPN Connect" - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.openvpn.openvpn) is not up to date and does not support "tls-crypt", which seems to work better behind some of the firewalls over there. So I had to use "OpenVPN for Android" (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blinkt.openvpn).

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:
On 2017-10-20 10:54 +0900 (Fri), Stuart Luppescu wrote:

> I don't know if it would be better if I used a bigger droplet with
> more memory.

Check the details of both the network bandwidth and network traffic
they're giving you with that VM. On systems not charging you
separately for network traffic, you'll get specific bandwidth limits
related to the overall "size" of the instance. (Just like memory and
disk.)

You might try bringing up an instance on something like Google Cloud,
where you'll pay separately for every byte of outgoing traffic to the
Internet from your host but where you have more control over the
bandwidth limits.

cjs
--
Curt J. Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974

To iterate is human, to recurse divine.
- L Peter Deutsch

--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at http://lists.tlug.jp/list.html

The TLUG mailing list is hosted by ASAHI Net, provider of mobile and
fixed broadband Internet services to individuals and corporations.
Visit ASAHI Net's English-language Web page: http://asahi-net.jp/en/

--
Georgi

--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at http://lists.tlug.jp/list.html

The TLUG mailing list is hosted by ASAHI Net, provider of mobile and
fixed broadband Internet services to individuals and corporations.
Visit ASAHI Net's English-language Web page: http://asahi-net.jp/en/

Re: [tlug] VPN in Debian