Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:27:06 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On 2017-06-29 21:33 +0900 (Thu), Benjamin Kowarsch wrote: > And Fukushima is a good example of cost cutting without any concern > for safety whatsoever. > > Which f***ing idiot would have been so f***ing stupid to put a > backup diesel generator for emergency cooling on the ground between > the beach and the plant? I'm not buying this. My understanding is that the size of the tsunami wave exceeded their design parameters. Thus you can't call them idiots for a design that appears to have been adequate to handle the given design parameters; you can only claim that they were wrong to go with those design parameters. > Very evidently, they were more concerned about saving 50.000 to > 100.000 USD and not concerned with safety at all. Wrong on two counts. They clearly had some concern about safety; that they had backup generators at all shows that. And _every_ engineering decision is about cost-cutting because you can _always_ spend more. There's a point to this: as a society, every dollar you save in one place can be spent on safety somewhere else, or spent on things more important than the additional safety. We're prefectly happy as a society to live with thousands or tens of thousands of traffic fatalities every year for the convenience of being allowed to drive our own automobiles, for example. > It was blatantly obvious that any flooding from the beach would > flood the generators where they were.... Sure, but it wasn't blatently obvious that a flood of that level would happen. On 2017-06-30 13:34 +0900 (Fri), Benjamin Kowarsch wrote: On 2017-07-03 09:56 +0800 (Mon), Raymond Wan wrote: > I'm somewhat late to this discussion...but all this talk about > Fukushima and Tepco's management failure and we rarely talk about the > successes. Ok, let's talk about a success: Fukushima. When you consider the hundreds or possibly thousands of people that would have been killed by an equivalant coal-fired power plant over the course of forty years, it's looking pretty good. (Unless, of course, you for some reason consider it "okay" to die in a coal mine, in a vehicle carrying coal to the power plant, of lung disease caused by the emissions of a coal plant, or whatever.) cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 To iterate is human, to recurse divine. - L Peter Deutsch
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: Benjamin Kowarsch
- Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links