
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:16:03 +0200
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- References: <CAFv52OC=rK=dWiAgBwrreKu8EW3uZX6SYhAn6XdqyoVpS4U69w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKXLc7fOrEq-PP1nzq6r+ODys32SSUKr3KFsqNCCnZCnqBZM=A@mail.gmail.com>
On 8 September 2014 12:42, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote:
> However the former dev, having a copy of the source, can release it anytime.
This makes sense.
> Company can try to seek employment misconduct, but will be hard. Especially
> now that we have a record of intent (you asking for legal advice on public
> ML), hypothetically.
I'll be sure to tell my hypothetical friend.
> Is it binary that has been deployed?
In this completely made-up, not based on any real world situation, it
would be a binary that has never left the walled garden of company
servers.
Cheers,
Josh
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index