Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 10:21:56 +0900
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- References: <53292BF2.6030309@dcook.org> <CAAhy3dsA3yJ+dhP8y5AnkDm0Rhepfe6TyxXwENkiWtrqtqAgYQ@mail.gmail.com> <53297BA2.5080006@simon-cozens.org> <CAAhy3dvO=bSZWbFTWxr6FCcwno9fKDccwFVoBGxX=qFCvdPByQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
On 20/03/2014 00:14, Raymond Wan wrote:Well, one "good" thing that publishers still do is quality control.Funny that we're talking about this while the whole Riken thing is happening.Anyway, being published by a major publisher guarantees precisely nothing about quality control, as this story (and other similar ones) demonstrate:http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763Yes, the publishers took the papers down - after their publication quality control was demonstrated to be ineffective and their editorial boards clearly hadn't read the papers at all.The only reason editorial boards haven't moved to shoving all their accepted papers up onto a free Wordpress blog or similar is... well, Stephen mentions inertia, which is certainly true, but really, it's about prestige."Being published by Springer" is still worth academic kudos, no matter how many times it is proved that a gibberish-generating computer program can also get published by Springer. Nobody likes to be reminded that the emperor has no clothes, because that damages their prestige. So academics prefer to collaborate with the racket too.On the other hand, a Real Astronomer friend mentioned the recent age-of-the-universe thing (BICEP2) in rather negative terms: they BICEP2 team put out a press release first, then afterwards an arxiv pre-print (for a journal "to be decided"). If journals didn't exist or if publication in a journal wasn't seen as the gold standard of truth, this would be a good "open source" way to do things - release early, release often (BICEP2 also provides the data files on their web site, which is a good step for reproducibility and something that PLOS is now insisting on) - but in the current universe, it smells like a way of generating buzz in advance and manipulating the submission process.It may just be that good, thorough science and bazaar-mentality processes aren't (seen as) compatible.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Raymond Wan
- References:
- [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Raymond Wan
- Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Simon Cozens
- Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- From: Raymond Wan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Wifi hotspot access in Tokyo
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links