
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Making better use of SSDs?
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:23:47 +0100
- From: Nava Whiteford <new@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Making better use of SSDs?
- References: <CAAhy3dvn+qbsmNqEpDFo_HSaJsVete79XF3niyy7EcEFpJ8ajw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8qCPKcrhqN-g9OrK51K9T5O4fFM4zR6gUoWjyvSdzkkbo=-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FC3972D.4090905@gmail.com> <20120528230440.a1ea287568f13b6aa3df3e94@kinali.ch> <4FC4B8AB.6020805@free.fr> <20120610134825.GA13042@fluxcoil.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
> > > Actually, there is an effort going on to use SSD for hierarchical
> > > storage. Ie use the SSD to cache reads and writes from a normal
> > > harddisk.
> > >
> > > I don't remember where i read about it, it was most likely lwn.
> >
> > That's bcache. [..]
>
> There are bcache and flashcache for this.
> Looks like bcache is used/pushed by google, flashcache by facebook.
> Both seem to be usable, but have not made it into the kernel.
As an aside, I've recently been using an SSD as swap to see if I can avoid
buying the large memory server I was asking about.
As expected, it sucked pretty badly. The system has 56Gb of RAM, the process
is single threaded and compute bound, and should have a random access pattern.
>From 56Gb to 70Gb, I get about 70% CPU usage. Beyond that things get steadily
worse, finally dropping to 10%.
I've also tried using zram, for in memory compressed swap. Currently this seems even worse.
Nav
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index