Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] system (filesystem+alpha?) for off-line backups
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:04:35 +0200
- From: Attila Kinali <attila@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] system (filesystem+alpha?) for off-line backups
- References: <CAKXLc7fDN_SMU1vp+=LnOSyBK+Z2sOMrL16fwgx+VbekJtmh6w@example.com>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:48:43 +0900 Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote: > So, back to the point, how do different popular filesystems score on > large amounts of data (1-2TB) and large amounts of files (1-2M)? > Is there a *nix FS that stores all the metadata as a single DB-like > structure that is easy to traverse (other than NTFS)? You want to have a look at jfs, xfs and btrfs (as soon as it's stable). Any fs of the FFS ilk will not scale well when it comes to deep directory strucutres or lots of files per directory. Attila Kinali -- It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no use without that foundation. -- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neil Stephenson
- References:
- [tlug] system (filesystem+alpha?) for off-line backups
- From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Holy smokes, Unity and Gnome 3 suck worse than I ever could have imagined.
- Previous by thread: [tlug] system (filesystem+alpha?) for off-line backups
- Next by thread: [tlug] Mac cups question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links