Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:43:22 +0100
- From: Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>
- Subject: Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- References: <20080609100250.0c50b21e.jep200404@columbus.rr.com> <20080609104023.6c886eda.jep200404@columbus.rr.com> <20080611215953.35c37ece.jep200404@columbus.rr.com> <20080612054943.GK3287@wasi.karlov.mff.cuni.cz> <20080612062138.GM3287@wasi.karlov.mff.cuni.cz>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:21:38 +0200, Michal Hajek <hajek1@example.com> wrote: > ... so I asked the friend (engine researcher) and he claims that here > in Europe (GB excluded) even two characters eg. 'cc' are not used. > People stick to SI units. I do not know about Great Britan though. Here in the UK we tend to use "ml". Occasionally you'll see cm³. As someone else pointed out, "cc" is pretty much only used to describe engine capacity. -- G. Stewart - gstewart@example.com If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.Attachment: pgpk7hrWn8amZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [tlug] '㏄' and '㎍' usage
- From: jep200404
- Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- From: jep200404
- Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- From: jep200404
- Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- From: Michal Hajek
- Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- From: Michal Hajek
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Opera release
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] moving - ISP recommendations anyone?
- Previous by thread: Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug]
- Next by thread: Re: '㏄' versus 'cc' and '㎍' versus 'µg' usage [tlug] plus '㎖'/"ml" and '㎤'/cm³
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links