Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:46:39 +0900
- From: Bruno <braoult@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- References: <20080525040521.GK4030@lucky.cynic.net> <48389DF4.4050200@raoult.com> <48393595.5090202@raoult.com> <b4d277190805242150u778a7e9x336055ccf64e9843@mail.gmail.com> <20080525133122.GT4030@lucky.cynic.net>
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:The only way you can hope to reasonably fast rsync or unison style
syncing is if each local machine has unencrypted access to the
filesystem. You might be able to do this livably by using encrypted
files on top of unencrypted filesystems.
This was my first idea... I just hoped to get another solution, but I will not, apparently :-(No [security], it's not. Were it mandatory, you'd be paying me tens of thousands of
dollars to set this up for you. Which I'm happy to do, of course.
Oh, what's that? Suddenly you don't need *that much* security? :-)
Even with these thousands, I guess you would not *guarantee* anything, would you?
But you are right, I don't need "that much" security :-)
br.
--
2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: Curt Sampson
- [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: bruno raoult
- Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: bruno raoult
- Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: Edmund Edgar
- Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] wireless router suggestions
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Raid5 box & backup
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links