
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Paul Graham's Disagreement Hierarchy
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:38:54 +0900
 
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
 
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Paul Graham's Disagreement Hierarchy
 
- References: <d8fcc0800803302133h3897a28ex8f92066a50e08e0e@mail.gmail.com>	<87wsnjpclc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>	<ed10ee420803310117r55772376o9d3baef752b9c776@mail.gmail.com>	<d8fcc0800803310200h31e89c16pf1732dd4dfdcc95d@mail.gmail.com>	<87sky7p4ep.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>	<ed10ee420803310628s6877373eta14a5c403dc048ad@mail.gmail.com>
 
On 31/03/2008, SL Baur <steve@example.com> wrote:
>  This all relates to Sturgeon's law - 90% of SF is crap, 90% of everything is
>  crap.
+1
>  The things I have noticed from decades of watching Usenet and later the
>  web, is that English skills are in general declining.  That a "high" level of
>  education is no guarantee of any kind of writing skill whatsoever.
+1
>  That non-native English speakers can often be the most literate in English,
>  especially those of non-UK European background.
+1
>  Editors are no guarantee for good copy, and you are not a True Reader
>  if you do not have dead tree books in your possession with typographical
>  errors, spelling and grammatical errors, etc.
+1
>  Excusing ignorance of history is perhaps the most stupid thing[1] one
>  can do.
+1
>  [1] The most stupid thing is refusing to learn from one's own mistakes,
>  but we won't go there today.
+1
___
6
Dammit, Steve, say something I disagree with already! I have no chance
to engage a DH level if you don't start being unreasonable! ;)
-- 
Cheers,
Josh
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index