
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Paul Graham's Disagreement Hierarchy
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:38:54 +0900
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Paul Graham's Disagreement Hierarchy
- References: <d8fcc0800803302133h3897a28ex8f92066a50e08e0e@mail.gmail.com> <87wsnjpclc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <ed10ee420803310117r55772376o9d3baef752b9c776@mail.gmail.com> <d8fcc0800803310200h31e89c16pf1732dd4dfdcc95d@mail.gmail.com> <87sky7p4ep.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <ed10ee420803310628s6877373eta14a5c403dc048ad@mail.gmail.com>
On 31/03/2008, SL Baur <steve@example.com> wrote:
> This all relates to Sturgeon's law - 90% of SF is crap, 90% of everything is
> crap.
+1
> The things I have noticed from decades of watching Usenet and later the
> web, is that English skills are in general declining. That a "high" level of
> education is no guarantee of any kind of writing skill whatsoever.
+1
> That non-native English speakers can often be the most literate in English,
> especially those of non-UK European background.
+1
> Editors are no guarantee for good copy, and you are not a True Reader
> if you do not have dead tree books in your possession with typographical
> errors, spelling and grammatical errors, etc.
+1
> Excusing ignorance of history is perhaps the most stupid thing[1] one
> can do.
+1
> [1] The most stupid thing is refusing to learn from one's own mistakes,
> but we won't go there today.
+1
___
6
Dammit, Steve, say something I disagree with already! I have no chance
to engage a DH level if you don't start being unreasonable! ;)
--
Cheers,
Josh
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index