Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 08:54:46 +0900
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- References: <op.t756gdbtp3esx5@mail.gol.com> <200803171322.13584.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080317210112.T39931@isris.pair.com> <200803180822.19747.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <20080318155544.79e7efac.attila@kinali.ch> <20080322090456.GH5267@lucky.cynic.net> <20080331135150.aab7cce9.attila@kinali.ch>
On 31/03/2008, Attila Kinali <attila@example.com> wrote: > Of course, my example is a bit on the extreme side, but rsync > claims to be fast and efficient, which it definitly is not. Not to defend rsync here, but just because an algorithm has a pathological case does not make it inefficient, it just means that it has a pathological case. Which is why algorithms are rated for best, worst, and average case performance. -- Cheers, Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- From: Attila Kinali
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] genkou youshi templates
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu won't format a 2GB SD card as fat 16
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] genkou youshi templates
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] rsync efficiency (was: The Mother of All (bash) Commands)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links