Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:55:22 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- References: <8534d2c10803110557w540012d9g7a048089be43c285@mail.gmail.com> <20080311225044.GC15275@pragmatic.cynic.net> <78d7dd350803120152x5773095fk1204bef3823c69e1@mail.gmail.com>
Nguyen Vu Hung writes: > Yes, I am using ab, which can be use for DoS. What is wrong??? :) Nothing, as far as that goes. Weapons are tools, and (van Vogt's gunships of Isher notwithstanding), tools are weapons. But tools are specialized. There are two generalized tools that I know of: the human hand and the human brain (heck, you could even argue that they're specialized to execution and planning respectively). Now, DoS generally targets a part of the system that is not a bottleneck in normal use. Something that can be used for DoS *may* be biased toward stressing that part of the system, rather than the parts that need stress testing for your purpose. > Is there something wrong with it? Wrong way to ask the question. Ask, what is right with it? Ie, does it actually test parts of the system I need to worry about? Second, what else is right, besides this test? Ie, what bottlenecks doesn't it test? And how can I hack up a test to cover those?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- From: Dimitar Dimitrov
- Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] recursively printing html Howto's
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] One laptop per child
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Apache MPM performance
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links