Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 02:53:38 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- References: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB014FDD9D@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> <200711051242.33956.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0711080057360.5279@arctic.cynic.net> <87bqa5471m.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Curt Sampson writes:
> The original "swap should be 2x RAM" recommendation came about because > earlier Unix systems' memory manager would commit a page of swap for > every page of RAM in use. Thus, if you had swap equal to RAM, you > effectively had no swap space.
Nice theory, but the fact of the matter is that up until 2.4 the recommendation on Linux was 1x RAM.
Sorry, miscommunication here. I was not talking about Linux; I was talking about the (much earlier) origins of the "swap should be 2x RAM" recommendations.
If Linux started out without that, power to it, but that would have been about a decade after everybody had pretty much decided that 2x swap was the way to go.
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- References:
- [tlug] A Swap Question
- From: burlingk
- Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- From: Daniel A. Ramaley
- Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] A Mac for the Auctions
- Next by Date: [tlug] JSTV anyone?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] A Swap Question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links