Re: [tlug] Richard Stallman (FSF) in Tokyo Wed, Oct 24th

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>]

emiddleton@example.com writes:

 > There is a precedent, and a workable solution.

This is not workable.  We're talking about GCC and the binutils,
remember.

 > I remember similar issues when the GNU Free Documentation Licenses
 > was found to be incompatible with DFSG[2].

Sure, but putting the GCC docs into nonfree is not the same as forking
the GCC distribution.  PGCC and egcs were bad enough, but at least the
licenses were compatible.