RE: [tlug] Re: [OT] UML Book

[<burlingk@example.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitar Dimitrov
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:02 PM
>
> Subject: [tlug] Re: [OT] UML Book
> 

This comment is more drivent towards the subject line
than anything actually in the messages in the thread.

:-)

Is the discussion of UML, and books on the subject
of UML, really OT?  :P  Does it warrant the [OT] flage
in this case?  Maybe I missed something, because
I didn't read the original post. ^^;;

-- 
Ken