Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 11:32:53 +0200
- From: Attila Kinali <attila@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- References: <46B36A56.2010506@gmail.com> <87ir7wbh62.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <d8fcc0800708040151s4cac90ebvedc1c984e66d7091@mail.gmail.com> <87zm17a9tp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20070804142238.99d4d0dc.attila@kinali.ch> <87vebv9w0a.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- Organization: SEELE
On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:09:41 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com> wrote: > That's right. You own the media, and under copyright law unless you > signed a contract limiting the term, your right to use and transfer > *that copy* is perpetual (ie, until it breaks). However, the license > to copy lasts only as long as the copyright holder grants, and the > GPLv2 says nothing about it. This is one of the main reasons why the > GPLv2 is considered a pretty mediocre piece of legal writing by many > competent lawyers, as I understand it. That's why the GPLv3 *does* > say something about it. Oops... I didn't know that the US copyright law is defined this way. The Swiss copyright law[1] is very strict what a copyright holder may do after he sold/gave away his art work. A withdraw of the license is pretty much impossible unless the license terms contain such a clause from the beginning and even then it might not always be legal. The only big exception a copyright holder/creator has something to say about his work is when and how it will be shown to public. This is mainly made for professions like architects or painters whose income is directly proportional to their fame which can only be build by publicly showing their work in its original state. Ie an architect can state that a building he has designed may not be changed for some years, or a painter can object that his picture is taken out of an originaly public galery and goes to a private gallery. But even for those exceptions there is an upper time limit until when the copyright holder/creator may have a say. Attila Kinali [1] Actualy it's not copyright law, but a creators right law. Thus it doesn't handle what you may do with your copy, but what the rights and obligations the creator has and which and to what extend these rights can be passed to other people. Biggest difference to US copyright might be that a creator cannot sell his basic rights on a work to anyone under any circumstances. Most countries in Europe, especially the EU have similar laws. -- Praised are the Fountains of Shelieth, the silver harp of the waters, But blest in my name forever this stream that stanched my thirst! -- Deed of Morred
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Phillip Tribble
- [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Emergency nomikai August 17th?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Apple owns CUPS
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links