Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:40:58 -0500
- From: "Daniel A. Ramaley" <daniel.ramaley@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- References: <d8fcc0800707162334w4c694ba2yd2b9b296e7964f94@mail.gmail.com> <20070717163913.109ec888.attila@kinali.ch> <d8fcc0800707171616r4d4b8d44i17d88d220b80a05d@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.5
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 18:16, Josh Glover wrote: >Is it necessary to set the blocksize at all with dd? I have not found >so in modern Linux, but I would like to know if you chaps feel >differently. It isn't *necessary*, but it often speeds up the transfer. I usually use 1M; RAM on machines made in the last 10 years is cheap enough to "waste" a megabyte. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dan Ramaley Dial Center 118, Drake University Network Programmer/Analyst 2407 Carpenter Ave +1 515 271-4540 Des Moines IA 50311 USA
- References:
- [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] From postgresql to some kind of graph...
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Meeting pics
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Tip of the Day: "ghosting" a machine with nc and dd
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links