Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Freedom (Was: [tlug] [OT] Say _no_ to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard)
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:07:26 +0900
- From: <burlingk@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Freedom (Was: [tlug] [OT] Say _no_ to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard)
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:14:09 +0900, "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com> wrote in <d8fcc0800707120814j4188e115y54a89e4c4fe35b8e@example.com>: > I would like to think that our common cause is freedom to > chose; mainly in the sense of one's own freedom, not the > "freedom" of RMS to dictate the terms of your "freedom" and > not the "freedom" that Microsoft offers to run any software > you want, as long as it is black.[1] > I think this is probably one of the most important comments made in the conversation so far. On the original topic, I do feel that the standard that Microsoft is pushing should be tanked. Standards are one thing that need to be totally open, otherwise they cannot be truly standards. How is it standard if only one organization and their licensees can use or implement it? Now, that said, freedom is the entire point of the movement. There are those who like to push their own personal agendas (and those agendas have changed over the last decade), but from the start it was about the ability to use the software you want the way you want. This is a two way street. People have to be free to choose. If that choice is Microsoft, then that is their choice. The game is about making sure they know what they are choosing and why. It is not about making the choice for them. People accuse Microsoft of trying to force people to choose. We should not force people NOT to use their software. If we do, then we are guilty of the same offense that people accuse Microsoft of. Their software is pretty much a defacto standard. It is what many businesses choose to use. We can try to influence their decisions, and we can choose what we as consumers purchase and use for our own machines. However, if a person or company's final decision is to use Microsoft, then we can't force them to change their minds. :P I personaly preffer Linux. I have not messed with any of the Unixes however. I may give them a try now that many of them are Open Sourced and freely available. ^_^ -- Ken
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] FINAL CALL FOR PARTICIPATION - Linux Training of Trainers LPIC-1 + FOSS Business Models - Hanoi, Vietnam
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] WiFi considerations
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Debian/etch3, apache2, mod_rewrite
- Next by thread: [tlug] Mailinglist software
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links