Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:19:54 +0900
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- References: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB139C37@messenger.cv63.navy.mil>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301)
>> For why see: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/accuracy.html#cycle >> (linux is one of the OSes that never show an uptime above 497 >> days; linux 2.6 apparently never goes above 49 days.) > > Has anyone heard of ANY operating system having this issue? My question was how on earth can someone from the outside know my uptime???!! It's not like apache returns it as a header, and I don't have "uptime-server" running :-). I fuzzily understood it as follows: it is something about TCP/IP headers using the time-since-boot as a unique id. Some OSes use the whole time, but linux only uses the low bits of the time. So if a machine has been up 500 days it shows (to the external world, via the TCP/IP headers) as only having been up for 3 days. Linux 2.6 uses even fewer bits so wraps after 49 days. Darren
- References:
- [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- From: burlingk
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Next by Date: [tlug] Linux based webinar solutions
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links