Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 12:37:32 +0900
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- References: <AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC318323740@example.com> <d8fcc0800612051552x2f2a2e49m5fbe233d05f6536@example.com> <87mz6121h5.fsf@example.com>
On 06/12/06, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote:
Josh Glover writes:
> Your function is exactly equivalent to:
The calculation is, but the compilation may not be. IIRC, some compilers are able to optimize the reference but not the pointer arithmetic if the function is inlined.
Interesting. I assume g++ deals well with this case; do you know? I may have to run some tests.
-Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- From: burlingk
- Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Email address munging in the TLUG archives
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] sorting data set -Help
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Getting back into C programming
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links