
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] issues with format of double (or IEEE754)
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:30:08 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] issues with format of double (or IEEE754)
- References: <20060726125907.GH5111@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.5-b27 (linux)
>>>>> "Michal" == Michal Hajek <hajek1@example.com> writes:
Michal> char result_normal_plus[17]="00000000000000000";
Initialize this to a number whose IEEE 754 representation you know,
then print it without reading from the device. That will tell you
whether doubles in memory are IEEE 754 doubles.
Michal> presult= result_normal_plus+2;
Have you tried
result_normal_plus[2] = '\0';
printf ("header = '%s'\n", result_normal_plus);
yet to make sure the alignment is what you expect, and the device is
producing the header properly?
Michal> where presult is a pointer to double, eg. defined as:
Michal> double *presult;
Michal> The problem is that if I print the number:
Michal> printf("*presult: %.12f \n",*presult);
Well, if you're not getting bus errors, I guess alignment doesn't
matter. This kind of casting is normally an excellent way to get into
real trouble, though.
Michal> Or maybe suggest a more clever [3] way of getting the
Michal> result from nanovoltmeter?
If you believe the documentation, you should just compute the number
yourself either using atof or a direct computation (do you really
think the nanovoltmeter gives you more than 32 bits of accuracy?)
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index