Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:52:57 +0900 (JST)
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- References: <439E67EE.9040403@example.com> <d8fcc0800512122339x103e5813g@example.com> <87k6e9wg6p.fsf@example.com> <d8fcc0800512130036p672393ebu@example.com>
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Josh Glover wrote:On 13/12/05, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote:Of course if you want to notice, you don't optimize for architecture, you optimize for space. That's the only optimization that helps much for most modern apps. ;-)Interesting. Can you suggest some CFLAGS that would do this?From the gcc docs:`-Os' Optimize for size. `-Os' enables all `-O2' optimizations that do not typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations designed to reduce code size. -- Tod
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- From: Mark Sargent
- Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] CentOS to Gentoo-Pros/Cons(if any)?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links