Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:35:37 -0500
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- References: <32a656c20502280445275ca503@example.com> <d8fcc080050228071171db42fb@example.com> <23c01e4f672d3e54a01e6c118045feb2@example.com>
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:25:08 +0900, Bruce Howard <bruce@example.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2005, at 12:11 AM, Josh Glover wrote: > > > He *is* telling the truth. I remember a telling comment from the VM > > codebase from my Linux kernel hacking class that said something like: > > "you are not meant to understand this code". > > The original version (line 2238 as I recall) would perhaps have been > better expressed "you should not have to understand this code". It is > tricky to get VM code right in any case, all the more so when your > model is too closely tied to the peculiarities of specific hardware. That is what the assembler code should handle. In a modern kernel, if it is in C, it should not be tied to any one architecture. -Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- From: ijw
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- From: Bruce Howard
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- Next by Date: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links