Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:12:59 +0200
- From: Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- References: <200407290224.i6T2O6Ks002212@example.com><20040729233553.GA648%jmglov@example.com><16649.46757.554176.880127@example.com><20040730134332.GB4387%jmglov@example.com>
- Organization: Nope, none here, it's a mess ;o)
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:43:32 -0400, Josh Glover <tlug@example.com> wrote: > I actually feel that a lot of systems software can *really* benefit from > OO, so I tend to agree with you here. However, C++ brings with it its own > can of worms (mangled names, anyone?). True. > Believe it or not, I would actually choose Java over C++ in most places. /me turns green (not with envy). > Before anyone starts throwing furniture, let me explain my reasons: I don't feel well enough to start throwing furniture right now... And your reasons do make perfect sense within a certain mindset, but read on. > Sure, Java is a memory hog. Sure, it is not as efficient as good C. But > if you have the memory to throw at it, why not? Because I never consider even for a second that what I'm writing is the only thing running on the box. That's Bill Gates' mindset, not mine. The school of thought I belong to basically persists in wanting to make the most of the resources at my disposal instead of assuming that it doesn't matter because there's oodles of spare CPU cycles and RAM. Oh, and disk space is cheap too now so we might as well compile everything static. > C just takes that much more effort. I don't care how macho a C hacker you > are, it does. I agree. Where we don't agree is just how much it's *worth* the extra effort. Why are 99% of the operating system I use and its auxiliary tools written in C rather than Java? What about the mailer I use? A few of the tools I use (including the GUI) are written in C++ - why not in Java if Java's OO is so good? ("because they suck" isn't an answer...:) -- G. Stewart -- gstewart@example.com -- gstewart@example.com Registered Linux user #284683 (Slackware 9.0, Linux 2.6.7-em8300) -------------------------------------------------------------- If the designers of X-window built cars, there would be no fewer than five steering wheels hidden about the cockpit, none of which followed the same principles -- but you'd be able to shift gears with your car stereo. Useful feature, that, -- From the programming notebooks of a heretic, 1990.Attachment: pgp00068.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- From: Shin MICHIMUKO
- Re: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004#194)
- From: Steve Smith
- Re: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- From: Viktor Pavlenko
- Re: [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] C vs. other languages (was: tlug-digest Digest V2004 #194)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links