Re: [tlug] Cisco Routing Issue

[Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>]

Quoth Josh Glover (Tue 2003-05-27 10:16:59AM -0400):
> I am putting a Linux firewall in behind our Cisco router:
> 
> 
> INTERNET == ISP == 123.456.7.27
>                           |
> 	                ROUTER
> 			  |
> 		   123.456.1.1 == 123.456.1.2
> 		                         |
> 				     FIREWALL
> 				         |
> 				  123.456.1.3 == 123.456.1.0/24
> 
> 
> What I need to do is configure the router to use FIREWALL (the Linux box) as
> the next hop for all packets destined for 123.456.789.0/24.

Did a little more digging, and I may have answered my own question. However, I
want to be affirmed by a card-carrying Cisco admin before I go (potentially)
sodding my router up.

Do I need to do something like:

ip nhrp nhs 123.456.1.3 123.456.1.0 255.255.255.0

in privileged exec mode? I want 123.456.1.3 to be a static next hop, since
it will not be running any sort of routing protocol.

Am I on the right track?


-- 
Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>

Associate Systems Administrator
INCOGEN, Inc.
http://www.incogen.com/

GPG keyID 0x62386967 (7479 1A7A 46E6 041D 67AE  2546 A867 DBB1 6238 6967)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 62386967

Attachment: pgp00115.pgp
Description: PGP signature