Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:49:06 +0900
- From: Stephen Lee <sl@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- References: <20020828203632.GS11721@example.com> <E17kEUb-0007MJ-00@example.com>
"Jonathan Q" <jq@example.com> wrote: > > Switch: Receives packets on an interface and sends them out only the interface > to which they are destined. [...] It is not possible for > a machine on any of the other ports to sniff packets on this network. This > makes switched networks inherently more secure than non-switched networks. I am sure Jonathan knows this, but the above is not _completely_ true. A switch does forward packets that are destined to unknown hosts (i.e. not in its MAC cache [not ARP cache]) to all (but the originating) ports. All in all, although a switched ethernet is more secure, one should not assume that an ethernet cannot be sniffed, switched or not. Stephen
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Jonathan Q
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Jonathan Q
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Why is Shift_JIS bad?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links